On social-engineering via sexuality (especially sexual-retardation)

There are many ways in which the cultures of the world control citizens; sexuality is among the most effective ways. Following is the tip of an iceberg of the ways in which cultures control their citizens by controlling their citizens’ sexuality.

Sexual-binary and Sexual-Exclusivity vs Pansexuality and Polyamory

Polyamory and Pansexuality: preferred by everyone (except those sexually retarded)

Polyamory and Pansexuality: preferred by everyone (except those sexually retarded)

In matters of gender-preference and “sexual-orientation,” homosexuality and heterosexuality are only as popular as they are because of socially engineered sexual-fear, socially engineered sexual-shame, and socially engineered sexual-confusion; all of these lead to a culture of sexually retarded sexual-minimalists, who pretend to believe in a “one and only,” necessarily excluding the gender that they do not prefer by way of the socially mandated spiritual poisons of forced-monogamy, demanded-sexual-exclusivity, homophobia and heterophobia.

Sexual-binary and population-control

Most proponents and opponents of homosexual marriage pretend to believe that, “You cannot help who you love” (even as nearly none of them would ever defend child-sex, incest or polygamy on such grounds). Meanwhile, in the United States, few are whatsoever leery of US incest laws, nearly all of which exactly reflect a society not concerned with “love” but rather eugenics: in several US states–Arizona and Utah, for example–marriage between first cousins is allowed only by couples who cannot have children–whether by the onset of menopause or by one or both of the persons being, for whatever reason, demonstrably sterile.

Homosexuality (and abortion) as population control

In most countries where homosexuality is legal, it was decriminalized only within the last few decades (after populations had stabilized).

LGBT and anti-male chauvinism

In the Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) “community,” laws against gay men are typically decried as laws generally against LGBT people, whereas (woman-centric) chauvinisim permeates nearly all LGBT causes, sexistly placing special emphasis on the plight of lesbians. Such hypocrisy allows for dividing and conquering of the “community” that could most readily combat the social-engineering of sexual-retardation.

When De facto laws especially target male homosexuals

Plenty women and men from many cultures encourage women to lay all over each other–hold each other, kiss each other, hold hands and massage each other–even as the men and women will either mock or scorn the same behavior in men.

Notice that celebrities are supposedly cutting-edge.
Consider Katy Perry’s laudation of female homosexuality, in her song, “I kissed a girl.”
Consider Katy Perry’s mockery of male homosexuality, in her song, “You’re so gay.”
Many sex-centric celebrities are nothing but candy-coated catalysts for social-engineers.

Notice that hip-hop artists are supposedly cutting-edge.
Consider rampant homophobia in hip-hop (against men).
Consider rampant homo-worship in hip-hop (of women).
Many sex-centric hip-hop artists are nothing but candy-coated catalysts for social-engineers.

When actual laws especially target male homosexuals

Homosexuality is illegal in many countries around the world. For the crime of homosexuality, penalties vary from jail time (in most places) to 10 years hard labor (in Jamaica as well as Saint Kitts and Nevis) to death (in Sudan, Saudi Arabia and many others). However, many countries criminalize male homosexuals but not female homosexuals.

The following countries criminalize males, but not females, for homosexuality:

  • Mauritius
  • Kenya
  • Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus
  • Jamaica
  • Belize
  • Nigeria
  • Nauru
  • Palau
  • Cook Islands
  • Tonga
  • Tuvalu
  • Seychelles
  • Lesotho
  • Malawi
  • Swaziland
  • Zambia
  • Zimbabwe
  • Sierra Leone
  • Ghana
  • Grenada
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Saint Lucia
  • Guyana
  • Uzbekistan
  • Turkmenistan
  • Palestine
  • Singapore
  • South Africa

Why would any country–let alone so many countries–outlaw male homosexuality but not female homosexuality?

Utility: male homosexuality vs female homosexuality

Many nations consider it to be in many ways useful when women have sex with women. For example, young women who spend their sex-drive with women are less likely to become pregnant, and so female homosexuality is useful for population control. Yet then we think, “But then why criminalize male homosexuality? Isn’t that also useful for population control?” Rather, a sustainable culture must, at least somewhat, fear male homosexuality. After all, if all the men in the world decided to be homosexuals then the population would become 0 in one generation. Moreover, for that final generation, women would be entirely helpless–either by their own learned-uselessness from over-dependence on men andor their helplessness to guard their resources against countless hedonistic men–it would be like a culture-wide version of so many western, man-crushing divorce courts–except, of course, in the gender-reverse: men would soullessly trample women’s rights, all day, every day–and no woman could flout her sexuality to convince men to secure rights for her.

Conclusion

There are many ways in which the cultures of the world control citizens; sexuality is among the most effective ways. The preceding was just the tip of an iceberg of the ways in which cultures control their citizens by controlling their citizens’ sexuality.

This entry was posted in Russ Lindquist. Bookmark the permalink.