This is my challenge to Danielle Paradis to debate the resolution “We should abandon the gender gap argument.” I argue in the affirmative: we should abandon it. Danielle, if she chooses to debate, will argue in the negative: we should not abandon it.
My definitions, which Danielle is welcomed to accept or else reasonably supplant or revise:
1. “We” — equality-minded people, however they self-identify (feminists, MRA, humanist, etc)
2. “Gender Wage Gap Argument” — the idea that women get paid less for equal work.